ISO Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment – Part 1 : Metrological Confirmation System for Measuring Equipment. ISO/IEC General requirements for the competence of testing A: The two standards in question, ISO and ISO have. ISO INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO. First edition .. and replaces ISO and ISO , of which it.
|Published (Last):||13 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||12.82 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If you want to generate true confidence of measurement that your customers and AB appreciate, then of all of those standards, I recommend Z It defines requirements relevant to the measurement management system in language that may illustrate interrelations to other parts of an overall quality management system.
If calibrations are just a subsidiary aspect of your business, then spending the money to get accredited may not be necessary, especially if its for internal use only.
Metrology ProgramQuality Progress. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Root Cause Analysis Samples.
From the scope of ISO In summary, ISO is a guidance document that addresses one element namely management of a measurement system of a quality management system. It encompasses all aspects of the laboratory.
Discussion related to the uso and timing of equipment calibration. There is a great deal of richness in the ISO family of documents and it is a shame for users to not know about and take advantage of the full range of possibilities. Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress.
Difference Between ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 10012
Skip to content 10012-1 It addresses such factors as contracts with customers, purchasing, internal auditing, and management review of the entire quality management system — ISO does not. It also depends lso the focus of your business. I am updating the instrumentation section of a product fabrication specification to replace a cancelled military specification MIL-STD that specified calibration systems requirements. Even if the organization chooses to adhere to the requirements of ISOthe certification to ISO does not imply certification to the requirements of ISO Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress Discussion related to the importance and timing of equipment calibration.
Difference Between ISO/IEC and ISO –
Correctly applied measurement, wherever and however it occurs, is an essential element of a successful business QMS. ISO is a guidance document and not intended for certification. ISO defines requirements for entire quality management system that can be accredited.
You can consider it a system within the quality ido system. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratoriesand I would like guidance on usage and application of these standards.
Io Robitaille Vice Chair, U. While the scope of both documents includes language that can perhaps cause confusion, what follows is the salient text from both that illuminates the difference between the two.
The competence referred to in the title of the standard relates to the competence of the entire system — not just training of personnel.
ISO describes the requirements for a quality management system that can be accredited a process comparable but different from certification. Pricey, however that is the direction calibrations are going in the future. ISO focuses on the requirements of the measurement management system. However isp you are performing calibrations for other companies, and you are not accredited yet, I strongly recommend Z An organization, for example, could have a quality management systems that is certified to ISO